Eddiej says that the shedding of blood is unnecessary to remit sin,but i guess God didn't know that, Heb 9: 22?

..." and without the shedding of blood there is no remission (of sin)


Eddiej should have warned God about having to send Christ to die for the sins of the world because he says it was not necessary, sounds like top notch antichrist, to me, does it sound like antichrist to you too honey, she says it sounds like top notch antichrist to her too , my wife is smart|||Jesus was born of a woman who was under the law to redeem them who were also under the law, so that with might be sons of adoption to whom God has sent the Spirit of His Son into their hearts crying Father, Galatians 4: 4-5





If the law of works could have given life then righteousness should have been by the law, but they who are under the law and they who are without law are both under sin, and is God's conclusion, so that the promise by the faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe. And that promise is the promise of the Spirit, Galatians 3: 10 14





anyone denying the cross of Jesus and His redemptive work is saying God did it in vain because they think they can be justified by the works of the law, Galatians 2: 16 Hebrews 9: 22 speaks of this truth,


How arrogant can he be that has said such a thing as sin being remitted without blood


And if it were not so someone so smart should have informed God.





How superfluity can satan possible get?








sincerely the truth, edwah z j|||Resurrection is cool.|||I don't take anything in the NT seriously. Along with at least 2/3 of the rest of the world.