Monday, December 12, 2011

If the role of Home Secretary is that important, why do we not currently have one?

"The Home Secretary is responsible for internal affairs within England and Wales, and for immigration and citizenship for the whole of the United Kingdom; England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland.


The remit of the British ministry also includes policing and matters of national security"





So, nothing important then! Can we continue in this vacuum?





Views please.|||jacqui smith has stood down today,but as for who should get the job?can we, the public trust any of them Labour or Conservative|||We DO have one. She is Jacqui Smith.





She announced this week that she wishes to be removed in the next Cabinet reshuffle, expected on Friday or Monday.





Interesting to note, when parliament dissolves, all MPs lose their seats until the parliament is elected, but all government ministers keep their jobs during the campaign, so there is no power vacuum.





BIG L - The Human Rights Act 1998 merely incorporates the European Convention on Human Rights into English law. It is nothing new - the UK signed the convention in 1950 - more than 20 years before joining the EU, and 47 years before Tony Blair came to office.





The Human Rights Act is one of the more sensible pieces of legislation. It tries to stop people needing to sue the UK government in the European Court of Human Rights by making sure that laws comply with Convention anyway.





Why was corporal punishment abolished in the 1980s? To stop the UK being taken to the ECHR under the Convention.





Note that neither the Convention itself nor the European Court of Human Rights have anything to do with the EU (don't confuse with the EU institution, the European Court of Justice)|||Hello.





Whilst the role of Home Secretary is important,the useless bunch of twits and imbeciles we've had doing the job since 1997 have all been so incompetent,weak-willed,lily-livered,goo鈥?the result is what you see all around you....





They've all been soft on crime.Even softer on the causes of crime.Laws passed which favour and reward criminals and punish the victims like the hated Human Rights Act.Weak-willed legislation,Police red-tape, short pathetic sentences,punitive fines,no capital or corporal punishments,daft schemes like unenforceable ASBOS,failure to deal with deportations of foreign criminals,unable to get to grips with UK security,immigration, etc etc etc ad-naseum!





I'd love the role.I'd make Britain great again and a safe place for people to live no matter what I had to do to achieve it. Anyone want to put me forward? Yes? Great stuff!





Big L 266|||we do have one - jacqui smith , she is not due to stand down till the next cabinet reshuffle which will probably take place next week , gordon brown will then put another person in charge








http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8鈥?/a>





"Jacqui Smith is to stand down as home secretary in the cabinet reshuffle, sources close to her have told the BBC"|||I am sure police and the security services would continue to operate as normal without a Minister who in reality in simply a figure head.





However, she is still in post she has only indicated her intention to resign.|||Having no-one in charge is still better than having Jacqui Smith.





Its still funny that her hubby ordered p orn because she wasnt taking care of things in the bedroom.|||We ain't got one coz she was bent !!

No comments:

Post a Comment